Why does the media hate educated people? Media analysis and speculation about which way democrats will vote has exposed an underlying message; the educated and african americans don't count. The only people that count are blue collar, uneducated white people. Why are they the ones who are deciding this thing? The know the least, what they know is often false, they often vote against their best interests, and they are the only ones that count. All the cable news stations say the educated are going for Obama. You would think people would be tired of a know nothing idiot running the country. Is this why blatant pandering is so effective?
Hillary is pandering like it's 1999. Her (John McCain's) gas tax, her new interest in racing, her dive bar whisky shooting, her elitist claims (she went to Welsly an all girls college and Yale), her loosely factual local upbringings (where is she from the south, Pennsylvania, Indiana, New York, where ever she goes next?). Check out last night's The Daily Show Panderer Box segment.
The Media bias is to have "experts" from either side pimp their talking points from separate little boxes on the screen. In reality almost all the time both these people are completely false (In this defination one of the conditions of an expert is that they have to agree with the status quo). Bill Moyers interviews the people that study these hacks. The article is long but very informative. Here are some excerpts.
BILL MOYERS: So how do you decide who is an expert? What makes an expert?
CHRISTOPHER CERF: Well, I think if you are in the government — this is one of the problems we have in the country — you are, by definition, an expert. In fact, you're unpatriotic if you disagree with someone in the government. And your expertise, if you had any before, becomes suspect.
-----------------------------
BILL MOYERS: In other words, the experts said we won the war, so we won the war?
CHRISTOPHER CERF: And they keep saying it. In fact, when the Basra invasion by the Iraqi Army, that was supposed to clean up the Shiites in Basra began. You may recall the president said that day that it was a decisive moment in the history of a free Iraq. And you can tell, since then, we-- it's practically over, right?
VICTOR NAVASKY: And, but to be fair, they don't all say that we won the war. There are a whole school of experts who say that we'll know in six months whether or not we've won the war.
BILL MOYERS: That's a repetitive litany in your book-
VICTOR NAVASKY: Yes.
BILL MOYERS: --all the people who keep saying three more months, six more months-- and it's a bipartisan litany. I mean, John McCain, Hillary Clinton-
VICTOR NAVASKY: John McCain, well, they had a disagreement. Hillary said in 2002, I believe, that it would be three to six months. And then, McCain said in 2003, it would be three months. Or vice-versa. It really doesn't matter, because what matters, that McCain has been mis-portrayed in the media now as saying he was an opponent of the war all along. This is an unfair attack on his patriotism. He was very supportive of this war and predicted it would be over in a matter of a short time.
-----------------------------
CHRISTOPHER CERF: Absolutely. In fact, one of my favorite quotes in The Experts Speak comes from a general in the Civil War. They were doing it even then. General Sedgewick, who surveyed the enemy battle lines. He was a Union general. And he looked out over the Confederate lines, and he said, "They couldn't hit an elephant at this dis--." Those were his last words, actually.
VICTOR NAVASKY: And it's not just from generation to generation. It happens within weeks. So, Condoleezza Rice said, "We don't want the smoking gun to become a mushroom cloud." Her great image, talking about what's gonna- And then, President Bush, a few weeks later, said, "We don't want the smoking gun to become a mushroom cloud." They borrow each other's language and they reinforce each other's message.
BILL MOYERS: Do experts have to work hard to be so wrong? It's not easy to achieve a grand consensus, right?
VICTOR NAVASKY: Well, I think it comes pretty naturally to them. And it's not only that they're wrong. It's that they are arrogant in their erroneousness. I mean, to take one of your colleagues in the press, Bill O'Reilly. I mean, he not only "it will be over in a matter of weeks." He would say-- he made a bet and said, "I will bet anybody and buy them a dinner" —where was the dinner going to be?
The Empire Strikes Barack
5 Years after "Mission Accomplished" the Bush Administration admits to a mistake... The "Mission Accomplished" banner was meant for the crew of the that particular carrier. In the speech he never mentions that particular crew, only the war in Iraq in general. 100% half assed excuse. These people have no respect for us. Oh wait I knew that already.
Keep your head up!
-Tad |